Our current Presedintial administration is looking to create a National Internet ID, that you would use for everything online. The following quotes are are pulled from the article, and the persons quoted in them are the U.S. Commerce Secretary Gary locke and White House Cybersecurity Coordinator Howard Schmidt.
Not talking about a national ID card... BULLSHIT! It's exactly that, just for online use instead of a card you carry around in your wallet. Unless they decide to go with a smart card, then you are carrying it around in your wallet. Admitted the smart card wouldn't be your actual ID card, but say you get arrested, now it's a confiscated item, and the local PD now has access to anything and everything they want to know about you, and all without a warrant (in CA anyways, You can read this for more info, I'm not going off on a second tangent here)."We are not talking about a national ID card," Locke said at the Stanford event. "We are not talking about a government-controlled system. What we are talking about is enhancing online security and privacy and reducing and perhaps even eliminating the need to memorize a dozen passwords, through creation and use of more trusted digital identities."
Let me point out the comment about the goverment controlled portion. If it's not governmentally controlled, it would be controlled by a single private corporation contracted directly by the government. So, it would be controlled by the government via a third party. Any way you look at it, it's all of your digital information (financial, social networking, shopping, etc.) in the hands of the government, and possibly a private corporation as well. So much for privacy. Also, later in the article they discuss the long fought battle of which governmental agency would get "authority of cybersecurity." So which goverment agency controls the system is still up for grabs.
Now this is some shit right here...
Oh, Fuck you too schmidt. It can't be done without being centralized. Yes you can spread it out accross multiple databases, but you still have to centralize the control of the ID's. Otherwise you get overlap/duplicates. Not to mention Schmidt was quoted saying the opposite earlier in the article.Schmidt stressed today that anonymity and pseudonymity will remain possible on the Internet. "I don't have to get a credential if I don't want to," he said. There's no chance that "a centralized database will emerge," and "we need the private sector to lead the implementation of this," he said.
It's "the absolute perfect spot in the U.S. government" to centralize efforts toward creating an "identity ecosystem" for the Internet, White House Cybersecurity Coordinator Howard Schmidt said.
When more info comes to light on this, and this thing starts to hit the house, and senate, it would be my recomendation that everyone write letters to their elected officals urging them to oppose this. it's just one more attempt by the current administration to lead us into a government controlled society. Fucking power hungry assholes.
Ok, I'm done ranting , and going to shut up now.